Where To Buy Electrolux Vacuum Cleaners
Electrolux is one of the biggest home appliance brands in the world. Selling over 40 million products in more than 150 different countries every year, the company employs more than 52,000 people to sell appliances both large and small. Its vacuum cleaner range is typically comprehensive, boasting several stick, upright and handheld vacuums to choose from. Check out our full overview of Electrolux vacuum cleaners below.
where to buy electrolux vacuum cleaners
The traditional bagged vacuum cleaners require you to put a bag inside them to catch the dirt, and they are by no means obsolete. In fact, they remain the most hygienic choice and are recommended for allergy sufferers and pet owners. They also need very little maintenance apart from changing the bag every so often. Bagless vacuum cleaners catch the dirt in a container that can then be emptied and reused. That saves you the cost of buying bags, but also means that you have to sometimes clean the container and filter. Find out more about different types of vacuum cleaners in our blog article!
Electrolux vacuum cleaners offer a variety of versatile cleaning options for every home that offer perfect cleaning for any floor surface, including hardwood floors and carpets, along with easy maintenance, long run time and powerful suction. Pick up an Electrolux vacuum cleaner today and clean even the tight spaces in your home.
Electrolux products sell under a variety of brand names (including its own), and are primarily major appliances and vacuum cleaners intended for home consumer use. Electrolux has a primary listing on the Stockholm Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the OMX Stockholm 30 index.
In 1919, a Svenska Elektron AB acquisition, Elektromekaniska AB, became Elektrolux (the spelling was changed to Electrolux in 1957). It initially sold Lux branded vacuum cleaners in several European countries.
While Electrolux had bought several companies before the 1960s, that decade saw the beginnings of a new wave of M&A activity. The company bought ElektroHelios, Norwegian Elektra, Danish Atlas, Finnish Slev, and Flymo, et al., in the nine years from 1960 to 1969. It sold its American subsidiary to Consolidated Foods in 1968, exiting the American market until 1974, when Electrolux acquired Eureka-Williams from National Union, one of the oldest names in the vacuum cleaner industry. Electrolux sold its vacuum cleaners using the Eureka brand name in North America until 2004.
Electrolux vacuum cleaners continue to surprise us, as they offer so much at such a reasonable price. There is a complete range of canister and upright vacuum cleaner types in the Electrolux range. Each of them has Hepa filters and sealed bodies which prevent allergens being spewed back into the air. They are consumer friendly in their designs and they are an excellent choice for the allergy sufferer. We test all our Electrolux vacuums and can attest to their quality.We offer a complete selection of Elecrolux vacuum cleaner bags, filters and accessories.
We've tested over 130 vacuums, and below are our recommendations for the best vacuum cleaners you can buy. If you're looking for more vacuums, check out our recommendations for the best lightweight vacuums, the best cordless vacuums, and the best bagless vacuums.
The functions of an Electrolux vacuum cleaner depend on the model you pick. Each type has different parameters, although there are also certain common traits. Electrolux vacuum cleaners are very quiet and provide effective cleaning.
The Electrolux cordless vacuum cleaner has been quite popular recently. Such models are lightweight and durable. Handheld and cordless vacuum cleaners from Electrolux have frames made of aluminium. They have a distinctive feature - a very ergonomic handle. The filtration systems can clean the air from bacteria and dust mites.
Electrolux vacuum cleaners can be usually found in electronics stores. The variety of products in physical stores might be quite limited, and not every model is available right away. In such a case, check online stores.
The prices of Electrolux vacuum cleaners might vary - depending on the model you want to buy. Cordless Electrolux vacuums cost from $300 to $500. The automatic Electrolux vacuum cleaner is the most expensive option. It may cost up to $700.
Sweden-based Electrolux Group, with $13.1 billion in revenues, makes consumer goods such as vacuum cleaners, refrigerators and other big kitchen appliances, as well as lawn tractors and chain saws. Heading this diverse operation is new Chief Executive Hans Stråberg, 46, who took over in April. Stråberg appears to be more low-key than his predecessor, Michael Treschow (Mike the Knife), who focused on cost-cutting. Stråberg is expected to emphasize product innovation and marketing. In Europe Electrolux owns more than 25 brands, which the company plans to consolidate into three core signatures: Electrolux, AEG and Zanussi.
Electrolux is now directing more attention to the U.S., where the company has had a confused identity. Its U.S. brands include Frigidaire (refrigerators, washers and air conditioners), Eureka (vacuum cleaners) and Poulan (chain saws).
Though Electrolux is probably best known in the U.S. for vacuum cleaners, the Swedish parent actually gave up U.S. rights to the Electrolux name more than 30 years ago. The brand has had several owners in the States, the latest a company now known as Aerus (FORBES, Nov. 12, 2001).
This action is based upon alleged trademark infringement and unfair competition. Admiral Corporation owns and operates numerous manufacturing plants throughout the United States and maintains distributors throughout the United States and the world. At the present time it manufactures or distributes television sets, radios, radio-phonograph combinations, refrigerators, electric ranges and some miscellaneous appliances and parts. Penco has an office and store in Rochester, N. Y. and operates stores in Elmira, Binghamton, Syracuse and Buffalo. It manufactures none of the products it sells. It sells at retail electric vacuum cleaners, electric sewing machines, electric floor polishers and parts for these appliances. Jurisdiction is invoked by reason of the fact that Admiral charges Penco with infringement of its trademark Admiral which has been registered in the United States Patent Office. The registrations cover a variety of electrical appliances. It is further invoked on the ground of diversity of citizenship involving a claim exceeding the jurisdictional amount for damages based on alleged unfair competition.
The defendant has challenged jurisdiction on both asserted grounds. Plaintiff's extensive sales of electrical appliances bearing the mark Admiral covering the entire United States, Canada, Mexico and foreign countries, and its large expenditures for advertising the mark in connection with its products, and public recognition of the mark as denoting plaintiff's electrical appliances are ample to establish the statutory requirement of the amount in controversy to justify jurisdiction on the ground of diversity of citizenship. A showing anywhere in the record that the jurisdictional amount is involved will satisfy the statutory requirement. Harvey v. American Coal Co., 7 Cir., 50 F.2d, 832; Food Fair Stores v. Food Fair, 1 Cir., 177 F.2d 177. Defendant asserts that its activities are wholly intrastate and not subject to attack for infringement arising as a result of rights conferred on the plaintiff by its federal trademark registrations. Defendant buys its vacuum cleaners in Chicago. The cleaners are shipped from Chicago either to defendant's headquarters in Philadelphia or direct to its stores in New York. Its sewing machines are imported from Japan, where the trademark Admiral is affixed. The sewing machines are delivered to defendant's headquarters in Philadelphia and shipped from there to its stores in New York. This is sufficient to establish that its activities are not wholly intrastate. Attempting to distinguish its activities from those under consideration in Pure Oil Co. v. Puritan Oil Co., 127 F.2d 6, it makes the novel argument that the shipments of vacuum cleaners and sewing machines bearing the mark Admiral, concededly interstate shipments, were shipments in cartons or crates which did not bear the trademark Admiral on the outside, and so did not involve the use of the mark in interstate shipments. This argument appeals neither to reason nor to precedent. Ironite Co. v. Guarantee Waterproofing Co., 8 Cir., 64 F. 2d, 608, 610. Moreover, even if it were established that defendant's use of the trademark Admiral was wholly intrastate, there is enough in the proof to show that such use has affected or may affect plaintiff's interstate use of the mark. Plaintiff has built up a reputation for quality of its products sold under the mark Admiral and public recognition of the mark as denoting electrical appliances of quality originating with Admiral Corporation. Defendant by its methods of selling products marked Admiral, over whose quality and over whose selling procedures the plaintiff has no control, has endangered plaintiff's reputation by customer confusion, and it may fairly be inferred that if defendant's use of the mark Admiral is allowed to continue such use by defendant, even if wholly intrastate would result in a falling off of plaintiff's sales in the area where defendant operates. This court has jurisdiction of the controversy on both asserted grounds.
Penco started selling its electric sewing machines and vacuum cleaners under the trademark Admiral in early 1950. It is undisputed that plaintiff used the trademark Admiral in marketing its products long before Penco decided to adopt it as its mark for vacuum cleaners and electric sewing machines. Up to early 1950 Penco had used the trademark Avalon to identify its vacuum cleaners. It then adopted the mark Admiral because "we thought it would be more receptive", because "it means tops in something." This explanation suggests the query why it meant "tops in something" in 1950 and not before, and if it meant "tops in something", why the mark was not used in its advertising. It did not advertise its Admiral vacuum cleaners or sewing machines. It consistently advertised rebuilt Singer sewing machines and Electrolux vacuum cleaners at a very low price for the purpose of securing leads to sell its Admiral machines. It is not too much to say that the rebuilt Singer sewing machines and Electrolux vacuum cleaners which Penco consistently advertised were not advertised primarily for sale. These rebuilt machines were advertised two or three times a week. Despite this consistent advertising Penco carries a stock in its Rochester store of about twelve to fourteen *1019 rebuilt Electrolux cleaners and the same number of Singer sewing machines. A salesman's commission was three per cent on rebuilt machines and eleven per cent on new machines. The primary purpose in advertising the rebuilt machines is to sell the Admiral vacuum cleaners and sewing machines which are not even advertised. The adoption of the mark Admiral on goods so closely related to those sold by the plaintiff strongly suggests that the motive was to take advantage of the plaintiff's established reputation. 041b061a72